🔗 Share this article

Per a new review, dozens of people having histories in the petroleum field have been placed within the existing leadership, featuring above 40 who previously worked personally for coal companies.

Context of the Analysis

This report investigated the profiles of nominees and personnel serving in the White House and multiple government agencies responsible for climate regulation. These cover important entities such as the EPA, the Department of the Interior, and the energy office.

Larger Regulatory Climate

The analysis comes amid continuing initiatives to roll back climate regulations and renewable energy supports. For instance, new legislation have released vast sections of federal property for drilling and phased out backing for clean energy.

Amid the firehose of negative things that have transpired on the climate side... it’s crucial to remind the public that these aren’t just steps from the vague, massive thing that is the administration writ large, stated one author involved in the report. It is frequently individual actors originating from particular moneyed interests that are carrying out this damaging deregulatory plan.

Significant Findings

Researchers identified 111 staff whom they considered as energy sector veterans and clean energy critics. That encompasses 43 individuals who were previously serving by oil firms. Included in them are well-known senior executives like the head of energy, who previously acted as chief executive of a hydraulic fracturing corporation.

The list additionally contains lower-profile White House staff. For instance, the division responsible for clean technology is headed by a former gas executive. Similarly, a senior energy advisor in the White House has occupied top-level jobs at large petroleum firms.

Additional Links

Another 12 appointees have links to industry-backed conservative policy organizations. These encompass ex- staff and fellows of entities that have actively fought alternative sources and promoted the continuation of conventional sources.

A total of 29 other appointees are ex- industry leaders from manufacturing industries whose operations are directly tied to oil and gas. Other officials have connections with energy companies that sell fossil fuels or government representatives who have supported pro-coal initiatives.

Agency Emphasis

Investigators identified that 32 personnel at the Interior Department alone have ties to polluting sectors, making it the most influenced federal agency. This encompasses the head of the office, who has long accepted energy funding and functioned as a bridge between energy industry supporters and the administration.

Campaign Finance

Oil and gas donors provided significant resources to the election initiative and inauguration. Since entering the White House, the government has not only implemented pro-fossil fuel regulations but also created incentives and exceptions that favor the industry.

Qualifications Questions

Alongside industry-linked appointees, the analysts found multiple government higher-ups who were selected to key jobs with little or no relevant knowledge.

Those individuals may not be tied to oil and gas so explicitly, but their lack of expertise is problematic, stated a researcher. It’s logical to think they will be compliant, or susceptible individuals, for the oil industry’s objectives.

For instance, the nominee to lead the EPA’s department of general counsel has very little court experience, having not once handled a lawsuit to completion, never taken a deposition, and never filed a court petition.

In another example, a administration aide working on energy policy moved to the position after serving in positions unrelated to the sector, with no obvious relevant sector or policy background.

Administration Statement

One official for the administration criticized the analysis, saying that the leadership’s officials are extremely capable to implement on the voters’ mandate to increase American resource production.

Historical and Current Context

This administration oversaw a massive array of anti-environmental steps during its previous term. During its current term, backed with rightwing plans, it has overseen a much broader and harsher rollback on environmental regulations and clean power.

There’s no embarrassment, stated a expert. The administration is proud and ready to go out there and publicize the fact that they are executing benefits for the oil and gas industry, extractive field, the energy business.