🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the most memorable moment of the baseball championship did not happen during the nail-biting finale on Saturday, when her squad pulled off one dramatic comeback act after another before winning in extra innings over the Toronto Blue Jays.

It happened in the previous game, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, pulled off a electrifying, game-winning play that at the same time upended numerous negative misconceptions touted about Hispanic people in recent decades.

The moment itself was stunning: the outfielder raced in from left field to catch a ball he at first lost in the stadium lights, then fired it to the infield to secure another, game-winning play. the second baseman, at second base, caught the ball moments before a opposing player collided with him, knocking him to the ground.

This was not merely a remarkable athletic moment, perhaps the decisive shift in the series in the team's direction after looking for most of the games like the underdog side. To her, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a badly needed morale boost for the community and for the city after a period of enforcement actions, security forces patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady stream of criticism from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy put forth this counter-narrative," explained the professor. "Everyone saw Latinos displaying an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, being leaders on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of masculinity. They're bombastic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"It was such a juxtaposition with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and pursued. It's so simple to be demoralized these days."

Not that it's exactly straightforward to be a Dodgers supporter these days – for Molina or for the legions of other fans who show up regularly to matches and occupy as many as 50% of the venue's 50,000 seats each time.

The Mixed Relationship with the Team

When intensified enforcement operations began in the city in early June, and military troops were sent into the city to react to ensuing demonstrations, two of the city's sports teams quickly issued messages of support with affected communities – but not the baseball team.

The team president has said the organization prefer to steer clear of political issues – a view influenced, possibly, by the reality that a significant minority of the supporters, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain political figures. Under significant external demands, the team later committed $1m in aid for families personally impacted by the raids but issued no public criticism of the government.

White House Event and Historical Legacy

Months before, the team did not delay in agreeing to an invitation to mark their previous World Series win at the official residence – a decision that local writers described as "pathetic … weak … and hypocritical", considering the Dodgers' boast in having been the first major league team to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the frequent invocations of that legacy and the values it embodies by officials and current and former athletes. A number of team members such as the manager had expressed reluctance to travel to the White House during the first term but then reconsidered or gave in to pressure from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Supporter Conflicts

A further complication for fans is that the Dodgers are owned by a corporate behemoth, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own released financial documents, involve a stake in a detention corporation that runs detention facilities. Guggenheim's leadership has stated many times that it aims to stay out of political matters, but its critics say the silence – and the financial stake – are their own type of compliance to certain policies.

All of that add up to significant mixed feelings among Latino fans in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this year's hard-won championship victory and the ensuing explosion of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to support the team?" area columnist one observer reflected at the start of the playoffs in an elegant essay ruminating on "team loyalty in our blood, but uncertainty in our hearts". Galindo couldn't ultimately bring himself to view the championship, but he still felt strongly, to the point that he decided his one-man boycott must have brought the team the fortune it required to win.

Distinguishing the Team from the Owners

Many fans who have Galindo's misgivings appear to have concluded that they can continue to back the team and its lineup of global stars, featuring the Japanese megastar a key player, while pouring scorn on the team's business leadership. Nowhere was this more evident than at the victory celebration at the home venue on the following day, when the capacity crowd cheered in approval of the coach and his players but booed the team president and the top official of the ownership group.

"The executives in suits do not get to take our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."

Historical Context and Neighborhood Impact

The problem, however, runs deeper than only the organization's current owners. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the late 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three working-class Hispanic neighborhoods on a hill above the city center and then transferring the property to the organization for a small part of its actual worth. A song on a 2005 album that documents the events has an impoverished parking attendant at the venue revealing that the house he lost to removal is now third base.

Gustavo Arellano, perhaps the region's most widely followed Mexican American columnist and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, dysfunctional relationship between the franchise and its fanbase. He calls the team the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an undue, even harmful devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for decades.

"They have put one arm around Latino fans while profiting from them with the other for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the summer, when calls to boycott the team over its lack of response to the raids were contradicted by the uncomfortable reality that turnout at home games remained steady, even at the peak of the protests when downtown LA was under to a nightly restriction.

Global Players and Fan Connections

Distinguishing the squad from its business leadership is not a simple matter, {