🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, the former US president seemed to embrace a strong position concerning the Ukrainian conflict. Following issuing warnings of "severe ramifications" last August in case Putin carried on hindering ceasefire negotiations, he eventually imposed substantial restrictions on the Russian primary oil companies, these major energy companies. This move substantially affected Putin's ability to support his aggression in the region.

However, through his latest comprehensive peace initiative for the conflict, which was developed by US and Russian diplomats without Ukraine's or EU involvement, the former president has apparently gone back to his pro-Putin stance.

Favoring Aggression

This plan would in practice benefit Putin for occupying Ukraine while putting the country's political freedom in jeopardy. Although strong proclamations that "The nation's autonomy will be affirmed", significant aspects of the initiative in reality undermine that very autonomy. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would certainly be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Showing his corporate background, Trump persists to view the situation in Ukraine as a mere border issue, like ceding Putin a portion of Ukrainian territory will satisfy the ruler. However, Russia's invasion is not simply about controlling a destroyed region of industrial-devastated land in eastern Ukraine. It is about the nation's democracy – and the Russian leader's clear desire to eliminate it so it ceases to serves as an attractive standard for the Russia's population of the democratic government that his growing autocracy prevents them.

Border Surrenders

Although maintaining in position the currently split regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's proposal would compel the nation to surrender the whole Donetsk province. Aside from benefiting Russia with area that its troops have been unable to capture in more than a ten years of warfare, this surrender would make Ukrainian military defenses critically undermined.

This region is the location of the nation's highly-touted "stronghold system", the fortified protective structures that are a critical impediment to invading forces. The proposal would have Ukraine abandon these positions, providing Russian forces a open route to the capital should he later choose to resume the conflict.

Armed Forces Restrictions

Then, in a action that would make additional conflict more feasible for the Russian military, the plan would force the nation to cut the scale of its armed forces from their current 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a limit of this lower number. Significantly, the initiative places no similar limits on the invading army.

Apparently as a accommodation to Putin's attempts to depict Ukraine's legitimate government as extremists, Trump's proposal asserts: "Any extremist doctrine and practices must be rejected and banned." Apparently to underscore this aspect, it demands that "The nation will hold elections in this period" of a truce. At the same time, the proposal places no obligation that the Russian leader endanger his authoritarian rule by conducting democratic processes in Russia.

Security Assurances

Admittedly, the plan makes the Russian Federation pledge not to "enter neighboring countries" and to "enshrine in regulation its policy of non-violence towards Europe and Ukraine". Yet considering that the Russian leadership has breached equivalent agreements in the past – for example the 1994 agreement, in which Russia committed to recognize the nation's sovereignty in return for giving up its historical atomic arms, and the previous peace deals, in which Russia agreed to a ceasefire and a restoration of occupied areas in the region to Ukrainian control – for what reason should anyone trust this commitment on this occasion?

For this reason Ukraine has been so insistent on western security guarantees. Although the proposal promises a "immediate coordinated defense action" if Russia restart its military campaign, and provides that "Ukraine will receive reliable defense commitments", the details vary from unclear to alarming. The proposal would not only prevent the nation Nato membership but also preclude Nato members from stationing military personnel on Ukrainian territory, thereby preventing the peacekeeping contingent, reportedly headed by the UK and France, on which Ukraine had been depending to stop Putin from restoring his weakened forces, rearming, and resuming aggression.

World Response

A separate parallel deal according to sources would offer the nation with a similar to NATO defense commitment, in which any future "significant, intentional, and sustained aggression" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "would be considered as an act of war threatening the peace and security of the allied countries." That suggests a defense action. But in contrast to a strong Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's primary protection against future invasion – the credibility of the parallel accord would hinge on the dedication of Western powers, including Trump, to act militarily to Putin's hostilities, a response they have {not